29 Result(s) Found
Source: Combined Federal Cases
Search Terms: mars pre/1 (inc or incorporated)
|
Compose a New Search
|
|
 |
11.
Mars, Inc. v. Coin Acceptors, Inc., 06-1144 , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 19, 2007, Decided , January 19, 2007, Filed
12.
Transclean Corp. v. Jiffy Lube Int'l, Inc., 06-1077 , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 18, 2007, Decided
OVERVIEW: Where a patent holder was found to be bound by its admission, as part of its litigation strategy, that an alleged infringer and its customers were in privity, the patent holder was judicially estopped from pursuing infringement claims against the customers, where it already obtained a judgment against the alleged infringing manufacturer.
13.
Mars, Inc. v. Coin Acceptors, Inc., 2006-1144 , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, December 8, 2006, Decided , December 8, 2006, Filed
14.
Highway Equip. Co. v. FECO, Ltd., 05-1547, 05-1578 , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, November 21, 2006, Decided
OVERVIEW: Where the dismissal with prejudice of claims pursuant to a district court's discretion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), had sufficient judicial imprimatur to constitute a judicially sanctioned change in the parties' legal relationship, the district court could entertain an attorney's fee claim under 35 U.S.C.S. § 285, and correctly denied the same.
15.
Pactiv Corp. v. Dow Chem. Co., 05-1260 , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, June 5, 2006, Decided
OVERVIEW: Agreement between plaintiff and patent owner precluded plaintiff from challenging the validity of the patents at issue. Provision that plaintiff's obligation to pay royalties would terminate if the patents were found invalid through any proceeding did not expressly reserve the right to maintain future invalidity and enforceability challenges.
16.
Mars, Inc. v. H.J. Heinz Co., L.P., 05-1410 , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, September 6, 2005, Decided , September 6, 2005, Filed
17.
Phillips v. AWH Corp., 03-1269, -1286 , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, July 12, 2005, Decided
OVERVIEW: In patent for modular, steel-shell panels that could be welded together to form vandalism-resistant walls, term "baffles" was not subject to 35 U.S.C.S. § 112, para. 6, so it was error to limit it to corresponding structures disclosed in specification and equivalents; requiring baffles to serve all recited functions read term too restrictively.
18.
Nazomi Communs., Inc. v. Arm Holdings, PLC, 04-1101 , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, April 11, 2005, Decided
OVERVIEW: District court's grant of partial summary judgment to a competitor on a patent holder's infringement claim was vacated and the case was remanded as the district court improperly focused on the validity of the patent claim to construe the term "instruction" and provided no basis supporting its noninfringement opinion.
19.
Outlast Techs., Inc. v. Frisby Techs., Inc., 04-1503 , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, March 30, 2005, Decided
OVERVIEW: Partial summary judgment of non-infringement that had been granted to a manufacturer was reversed because the district court had not properly construed the claim when it determined that the prosecution history unambiguously excluded fabric, such as the manufacturer's, that had been enhanced through an embedding process.
20.
Versa Corp. v. Ag-Bag Int'l Ltd., 03-1445 , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, December 14, 2004, Decided
OVERVIEW: In an infringement case, court erred in construing claim concerning means for creating air channels in compost to require both flutes and perforated pipe, as it was clear from the specification and the claim language that flutes were not required.
|
Compose a New Search
Back to Top
|
|
Did you find the case you're looking for in these results?
If not, check the available
jurisdictions and courts for
Free lexisONE
Case Searches.
|
| |
Select a case name link to read the full display of the case � absolutely FREE!
If you are not a registered lexisONE user, you will be asked to register. Registration is free.
Did you find the case that you're looking for with this free search?
Run this same search with results decided within the last five years at Lexis.com
Tell me more about lexis.com searches!
|
Previous 10